Challenges in Introducing Value Education at Higher Education in India

Value Education is a much-debated and discussed subject in the plethora of education in India. Of course, the main purpose of any education will indeed go with Value orientation. However, more concentration on Value education has been given at the primary and secondary level of school education than in higher education in India. Values could be effectively imparted to young minds rather than to mature ones. It may be the reason for this importance given at the school level. There are so many modules designed with the help of agencies like NCERT and others for effectively imparting the value of education to school students.

In this context, many innovative educational practices are being identified by experts. Many recent experiments and studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of teaching value education at the school level. Some schools have very innovative and radical course designs to impart the values.

Effective teaching practices in imparting value education range from storytelling, exhibitions, skits, one-act play, and group discussions to various other formats. Educationists have evolved new methods to create an effective learning sphere. Electronic gadgets also gain importance in the teaching-learning practices of value education. But at the higher education level, due to various reasons, the priority given to value education is not as much as it is provided at the school level. The curriculum and the teaching methods also could be subjected to scrutiny. Colleges are indeed meant for a kind of specialization in some field of education.

But in the Indian social context, the youth require direction and counseling. They have been exposed to various challenges at this stage, which demands the intervention of educationists for their betterment. Their character building also strengthens at this juncture. Students’ perceptions of multiple life factors and events are shaped at this stage. On the whole, they evolved their philosophy of life.

Their sensitivity and knowledge are getting direction at this stage. Hence, an effective value orientation becomes inevitable to the students of colleges. Keeping this requirement in mind, States like Tamilnadu introduced a compulsory paper/course on value education to undergraduate students of all colleges in the State under the choice-based credit system. Though this kind of effort is made with the good intention of imparting values to the youth, many limitations could be identified in bringing out the expected outcome.

Summary show

The problem mainly begins with the definition of values. Defining the term ‘value’ poses a challenge to all scholars. The term value is loaded with a variety of meanings. Each meaning reflects its philosophical position. Generally, the term value is spontaneously associated with religious values. Many Indians believe that values are nothing but the religious and spiritual guiding principles of life. Hence, it is supposed that the path is already laid for the life journey. But in the context of modernity and modernism, a fundamental question arises of whether value education is required in a modern state. Some argue that everyday life is based on science and technology and is value-neutral. They view the values as bugbears held out by people living in the past, glued to outdated religious principles irrelevant to the 21st century.

At this point, another group of modernists propagates the necessity of value education at learning centers to safeguard the democratic state Statets values. They wish to cultivate modern secular values such as honesty, respect for others, equality, collectivity, democracy, respect for human rights, sharing equal space in the public sphere, and so on. These values are considered the products of the Enlightenment period. Hence, four positions could be arrived at based on the above understanding. They are:

1. religious values are essential for everyone and must be included in the curriculum.
2. religious values should not find a place in the educational system. They may operate in the private sphere.
3. There are non-religious secular values, and they must find space in education.
4. There is no need for teaching value education in academics because they cannot be cultivated through formal learning, and such value cultivation will make the individual biased.

As a consequence of these positions, the following questions arise.

1. Does value education find a place in the educational system?
2. If required, what values should be given preference in the curriculum?
3. What is the importance of being given to the religious values that are primarily developed based on scriptures?
4. Can modern values alone be sufficient, or is there any possibility of blending the values of modernity with religious values?
5. If religious values are important in the curriculum, which religion will find a prime place? If there is contradictory propagation of a single virtue by two religions, how will they be handled?
6. Similarly, religions differ in their practices. Beliefs differ in their outlook from eating patterns, dress mode, marriage systems, war tactics, killing, and punishments to various other aspects. In this situation, what sort of perceptions need to be taught?